Categories

• Community Forum User Guide

  Quick Start User Guide

  3
  Topics
  4
  Posts

  

  Hi Nicole,

  The following should help.

  https://support.appcoll.com/prior-art/cross-cite-prior-art-references

  Specifically the section titled" Copy selected references from one matter to another"

  Please let us know if this works.

• Announcements

  Latest News

  9
  Topics
  20
  Posts
  No new posts.
• General Discussion

  General AppColl Chat

  16
  Topics
  37
  Posts
  No new posts.
• Product Requests

  What would you like to see?
  The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

  1. The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority.
  2. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that.
  3. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

  We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

  We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

  191
  Topics
  580
  Posts

  

  I have an IN provisional application where my docketing department inadvertently entered 1/10/2024 as a filing date; it has no Connections to any other application. The priority date changed to 1/10/2024 once the filing date was entered.

  They then realized that they'd entered the wrong filing date and changed it to 1/11/2024 and saved the record. But the priority date didn't update to match.

  If a priority connection is specified, then the priority date changes to match the earliest priority date of the "Connections" and is hard-coded; you can't change it.

  The priority date not updating to match the filing date for applications that don't have priority connections seems like a bug. Although maybe there's some reason I'm not seeing for this behavior. The only one I can think of is if you maybe have to import a bunch of legacy matters into AppColl and want to have key date information but don't care about specifying the priority chain. But even if that were the case, it seems like maybe the default approach should be to update the priority date field to match the filing date when the filing date is edited....

  Curious to hear if this is on purpose or a bug....

• AppColl Tandem

  All Things Tandem

  4
  Topics
  8
  Posts
  No new posts.
• Prosecution Manager (PM)

  All Things PM

  Signatures Module

  General

  Tasks Module

  PM Invent Module

  Matters Module

  Prior Art Module

  Billing Module

  Files Module

  Reports Module

  Conflicts Module
  76
  Topics
  183
  Posts

  

  @gregg_appcoll Yes, the issue I pointed out occurs on the "Payments Summary" page, which is the first page of my invoice and includes the client's mailing address, so it is the first page the client sees when he opens the invoice. Adding some text to clarify that the "Items through..." date covers payments and retainers (but not billing items) would be helpful. Thanks.
  In addition, it would be nice to have the invoice (perhaps optionally) show the period covered, i.e. the cut-off date.
  George

• Files

  Share Files!

  4
  Topics
  10
  Posts
  No new posts.