Topics created by CarolynC8596

Hi there. AppColl here. We appreciate the request and will certainly take this under consideration.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

I would use type "Other". Most non-"Other" types can have an effect of triggering generation of one task or another from AppColl-provided built-in Task Types.

With Type "Other", you might be able to create custom Task Types for an EP opposition workflow.

I use Other for trademark enforcement matters.