AppColl Logo
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. ChristianS9906
    3. Topics
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 52
    • Posts 107
    • Best 70
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by ChristianS9906

    • ChristianS9906

      Browser-specific Default Email Template Editor Selection
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      1
      2
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      121
      Views

      No one has replied

    • ChristianS9906

      Admin-modifiable UI
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      3
      3
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      161
      Views

      ChristianS9906

      @jonah-soundhound-com Yeah, I thought of that as well--but at some point, too much customizability becomes problematic for AppColl since it makes it difficult for them to write coherent instructions for users (if you have a screen shot showing where fields are but users may have completely different UI layouts, that may introduce headaches).

      However, one way to maybe address that is to have a button/toggle in the UI that lets users instantly flip between a "default" AppColl UI layout (like it is now) and a customer-defined layout (in which admins could reposition any fields to suit the needs of their attorneys/admins). That way AppColl's help files are still applicable to the AppColl default, but users can also use custom layouts--with the understanding that AppColl help files are intended to be directed at the default layout....

    • ChristianS9906

      More Granular Control Over Priority Connections
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      3
      2
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      179
      Views

      ChristianS9906

      @jonah-soundhound-com
      37 CFR 1.78 requires that "[t]he reference also must identify the relationship of the applications, namely, whether the later-filed application is a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part of the prior-filed nonprovisional application, international application, or international design application." Not the same weight as 35 USC 120, of course, but still something I think should be complied with.

      I suspect that you may be correct that it might not actually impact the priority claim's validity if one did not, but I would not want to test it--at the very least, there could be an argument that a patentee committed inequitable conduct by, for example, labeling a CIP priority claim as a normal "continuation" priority claim. This might cause an Examiner to mistakenly assume that the subject matter in the application is identical to that in the parent, and thus incorrectly apply the parent's priority date to all claim elements when some of those claim elements were not in the priority application and not entitled to that earlier date....

    • ChristianS9906

      <NewField> AdjustedExpirationDate
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      2
      3
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      148
      Views

      JonahP1621

      Dear AppColl,

      Please implement this request with high priority. While this is not a big deal for professional prosecutors, it is a big deal for users who use AppColl to manage portfolios.

      Thank you.
      ~Jonah

    • ChristianS9906

      Transactions Report - Allow Column Editing
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      95
      Views

      No one has replied

    • ChristianS9906

      AppColl account syncing - better Connections syncing
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      2
      1
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      133
      Views

      gregg_appcoll

      Hi Christian,

      Protecting existing subject matter connections is certainly import. We're looking into this. Thank you for pointing this out.

    • ChristianS9906

      New Field Syntax: List()
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      1
      2
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      128
      Views

      No one has replied

    • ChristianS9906

      "Discussion" comments
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      7
      3
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      385
      Views

      gregg_appcoll

      Hi @TarC6989 we don't currently have a way to do this. However, we will pass this on to our engineers for future consideration. Thank you.

    • ChristianS9906

      New Field Request: InventorEmails
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      2
      4
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      192
      Views

      S

      +1 for this request (see also a similar topic https://forum.appcoll.com/topic/78/new-field-matter-inventorfirstnames/3?_=1663253526501 )

    • ChristianS9906

      USPTO Differences Functionality Enhancement
      Product Requests • • ChristianS9906

      1
      6
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      141
      Views

      No one has replied

    • ChristianS9906

      Increased flexibility in how Contacts are listed in reports
      Reports Module • • ChristianS9906

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      226
      Views

      No one has replied

    • ChristianS9906

      Aliases for Report Columns
      Reports Module • reports aliases column headers • • ChristianS9906

      1
      4
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      170
      Views

      No one has replied

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 3 / 3