AppColl Logo
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Groups

    Task User Fields

    Product Requests
    6
    6
    355
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JonahP1621
      JonahP1621 last edited by

      It would be nice to have TextBox, DropDown, MultiSelect, and Date custom user fields for tasks like there are for matters.

      GeorgeJ4336 M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • gregg_appcoll
        gregg_appcoll @ChristianS9906 last edited by

        @ChristianS9906 We have elevated the priority and will discuss at our next engineering projects review.

        • AppColl Support
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ChristianS9906
          ChristianS9906 @support_appcoll last edited by

          @support_appcoll Has there been any movement on implementing this idea? It would be hugely useful to have the ability to define some custom fields for tasks.

          For example, a field for "In IDS Database" to record whether an Office Action and its cited references have been added to the IDS database. Or "recommendation sent" to indicate that the client has been provided with a recommendation.

          Christian

          gregg_appcoll 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • support_appcoll
            support_appcoll last edited by

            Hello All. This is a good idea and something we will add to our list of engineering projects. Thank you for the feedback.

            ChristianS9906 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • M
              MarkW5689 @JonahP1621 last edited by

              I agree with this.
              For example:
              We have been using the task "comments" field for various things including as an explanation field for the task. Right now, we include information as to when a task is opened (and should remain open) and information as to when a task should be closed (and with what state).

              It would be great to be able to have a separate field for explanations of the task so the comments field is cleaner and more geared toward the specifics of the particular task.

              Additionally, it would be great to be able to have additional fields in a task for use in templates (e.g., invoice info for an invoicing task that can populate billing items, etc.). Right now, if that information is just in the comment field we can't use it for other functions (e.g., the default comment information--see above or status information about the task).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • GeorgeJ4336
                GeorgeJ4336 @JonahP1621 last edited by

                @jonah-soundhound-com
                Agreed! I have a task to "Pay foreign associate," although it could be more generally "Pay vendor," such as draftsman. I'd like to be able to store the vendor's invoice number and invoice amount in the Task, then use those fields in generating e-mail messages. It would be even more useful if Tasks were augmented to be able to Create Form Letters (for example, as Matter Detail pages can do). Then, I could print the vendor's check from the Task, and print a payment cover letter from the Task, and send the vendor a payment advice via e-mail, all from the Task. Some of this would require expanding the number of fields that return values in Tasks. For example, currently {Matter.ForeignAssociate} returns a value, but {Matter.ForeignAssociate.Company} and {Matter.ForeignAssociate.Street} do not return values within a Task.

                This situation is a reason to support multi-level fields, such as {Task.Matter.ForeignAssociate} or {Task.Matter.ForeignAssociate.Company} or {Task.Matter.ForeignAssociate.Street}.

                Another useful user field would be check number, to record the check with which I paid the vendor. All these fields could, of course, be user-defined, as Jonah suggests. But, the number of fields that return values in Tasks needs to be expanded, and Tasks need to be able to Create Form Letters. (I will post these as separate suggestions.)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post

                0
                Online

                551
                Users

                336
                Topics

                967
                Posts