Yes there is. There is a regenerate tasks button available. See below for a video covering this process.

https://support.appcoll.com/tasks/regenerate-tasks-w-video

Yes we do support LEDES files in xml format

Hi Jonah - While we currently grab the respective document(s) for each eOA --e.g. we do grab docs that go with 892 actions that come in-- I'll send this over to the Engineering team to see if it's something we can/should/could do. I like the idea of never having to log into PAIR (for various reasons, ha).

Scott

I would use type "Other". Most non-"Other" types can have an effect of triggering generation of one task or another from AppColl-provided built-in Task Types.

With Type "Other", you might be able to create custom Task Types for an EP opposition workflow.

I use Other for trademark enforcement matters.

This is a good idea. We have passed this on to our engineers. Thank you for the suggestion.

Hi Brandon. This is an excellent suggestion and something we plan to implement in the future. We do not have an ETA yet. However, we will make an announcement when this is available. We hope this helps.

This is a good suggestion and one we will pass on to our engineers for their consideration. Thank you.

Thank you so much for your suggestion.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Brandon. Thank you for your suggestion.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi there. AppColl here. We appreciate the request and will certainly take this under consideration.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Jonah. Thank you for the suggestion. This is a good one.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Jonah. Thank you for the suggestion. It's a great idea.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Thank you for the request Brandon.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority.
The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that.
The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?
We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Yup, I agree, this is a little task that I do, but I would love it if it were already completed when I received the doc!

This would be so helpful for me. I have no doubt it would assist AppColl beginners to organize the information on reports more easily as well!

Hi-

You would just need to filter on all tasks containing "Maintenance" or "Annuity".

Here is a support article explaining:
https://support.appcoll.com/getting-started/searching-and-filtering-your-data

@MarkW5689
Agreed! Adding a "Create Form Letter" button, as in the Matter Details page, would be great. Indeed, just about every page would benefit from a "Create Form Letter" button. See my separate post advocating for such a button on the Task page.

@KimG5166 I like the idea. I would find it very useful. My first thought was that it would be a big project/change for the AppColl team.

However, on a second thought, it might not be very difficult to implement. The Account Settings allow custom fields of type TextBox, DropDown, or MultiSelect. MultiSelect allows a database query for a source of values. The database query must be a Boolean expression.

Perhaps AppColl could implement another type of custom field with a name such as DatabaseQuery. It would allow the user to enter any valid database query. It could, for example, allow IssueDate-FilingDate (which would tell you how long an application was pending).

I hope that they implement the request for matters soon.

I believe that your request for Today-OpendOn is for tasks database queries, not matter database queries. That would require that AppColl first enable custom fields for Tasks like they have for Matters. That probably deserves a different product request.

There's already a link from the matter to billing items for it. Look for the green $ just to the left of the matter number at the top of the matter details screen, or in the group of icons in the Links column of a list of matters.

Yes - patent committee members can reset the status so the inventors can edit