@Timothy Several people requested that syntax be added to enable conditional selection of field contents, such as when a first field is null. See the thread at https://forum.appcoll.com/topic/201/syntax-for-alternate-field-when-a-first-field-is-blank. I, for one, still would like to see such syntax added. For one thing, it would alleviate the need for one-off special fields, such as {Matter.ClientContact.NicknameOrFirst}, in that we users could program our own such fields.

Also see this thread (https://forum.appcoll.com/topic/204/add-calculations-if-then-logic-and-database-queries-to-template-fields?_=1704255780781) on a related topic.

@gregg_appcoll said in Additional Date and Text Fields on Task Level:

@KimG5166 this is on our list of future projects. We will make an announcement when this has been added. We hope this helps.

Any update on this @gregg_appcoll?

@gregg_appcoll Thanks. How long does it typically take for an issued patent to be available on espcaenet to grab the references cited?

@gregg_appcoll Yes, the issue I pointed out occurs on the "Payments Summary" page, which is the first page of my invoice and includes the client's mailing address, so it is the first page the client sees when he opens the invoice. Adding some text to clarify that the "Items through..." date covers payments and retainers (but not billing items) would be helpful. Thanks.
In addition, it would be nice to have the invoice (perhaps optionally) show the period covered, i.e. the cut-off date.
George

Thanks for the suggestion. We will certainly pass this on to engineering.

@gregg_appcoll adding onto the Power of Attorney yes/no. It would be helpful if a POA form could be linked to the actual contact (assignee or inventor)

@BrandonK6644 Whoops, looks like I had the same idea, but a few weeks later https://forum.appcoll.com/topic/343/set-task-background-color-based-on-taskstatus?_=1748361445416

Hi Catherine,

This has been added to your account. We hope this helps.

HI Rebecca,

We have added this to our list of items to address. We will certainly let you know when this has been added.

@KarenH9267 Thank you for your feedback. This is a great suggestion. We will certainly pass this on to engineering for consideration.

Hello Kate and Melissa,

This is a good idea and something we have formally submitted to our engineering team as a new feature. It may take some time, but it will be added. Thanks for your continued feedback.

Thank you both for the suggestions. We will pass this onto engineering for consideration. We hope this helps.

Hi Darin,

We are happy to have a call with you to discuss how Finances would fit in your situation. Sales will reach out to you.

Thanks,

AppColl Support

Currently, there is no limit.

Yes, Invention Manager and Prosecution Manager integrate perfectly with one another. Integrating both products gives full view of all IP from start to finish.

It sure is.

Tandem is gaining lots of traction...it's easy to use and free's up the firm from sending reports to their clients

Yes. See below.

https://support.appcoll.com/contacts/change-user-permissions-and-restrict-access

The data is "read only".

That would be cool