https://support.appcoll.com/contacts/enable-and-disable-logins?from_search=86964903

Enabling and Disabling logins are fully controlled by an administrator of your account. From the Contacts Module, you can enable/disable a login with the click of a button.

You can easily see closed tasks from the Tasks Module. In the lower left corner (under the Change View section) you will see a drop down as shown below. Select the All Completed option.

774ddff1-0839-4b54-ac6b-6828ae466fa7-image.png

You have the ability to add custom UTBMS codes to a billing item. Currently, there is not a way to save them for re-use. They would have to be manually added for each billing item.

https://support.appcoll.com/files/change-the-default-matter-folders?from_search=86966576

AppColl automatically creates a sub folder for each new matter created in AppColl. The sub folder, named after the AttorneyRef, is placed under the client folder. Each matter folder has four default sub-folders named:

-AsFiled
-ClientCorrespondence
-OfficialCorrespondence
-WorkinProgress

https://support.appcoll.com/general-information/tandem-account-overview?from_search=86967705

An AppColl Tandem account is an effective and secure way for IP firms using AppColl PM Plus to provide clients with a controlled copy of their own IP portfolio information.

https://support.appcoll.com/general-information/appcoll-pm-plus-features-overview?from_search=86967555

AppColl PM Plus is an upgraded product tier that offers users an increased level of automation and functionality.

Yes there is. There is a regenerate tasks button available. See below for a video covering this process.

https://support.appcoll.com/tasks/regenerate-tasks-w-video

Yes we do support LEDES files in xml format

Hi Jonah - While we currently grab the respective document(s) for each eOA --e.g. we do grab docs that go with 892 actions that come in-- I'll send this over to the Engineering team to see if it's something we can/should/could do. I like the idea of never having to log into PAIR (for various reasons, ha).

Scott

I would use type "Other". Most non-"Other" types can have an effect of triggering generation of one task or another from AppColl-provided built-in Task Types.

With Type "Other", you might be able to create custom Task Types for an EP opposition workflow.

I use Other for trademark enforcement matters.

This is a good idea. We have passed this on to our engineers. Thank you for the suggestion.

Hi Brandon. This is an excellent suggestion and something we plan to implement in the future. We do not have an ETA yet. However, we will make an announcement when this is available. We hope this helps.

This is a good suggestion and one we will pass on to our engineers for their consideration. Thank you.

Thank you so much for your suggestion.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Brandon. Thank you for your suggestion.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi there. AppColl here. We appreciate the request and will certainly take this under consideration.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Jonah. Thank you for the suggestion. This is a good one.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Hi Jonah. Thank you for the suggestion. It's a great idea.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority. The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that. The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?

We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Thank you for the request Brandon.

The speed with which we implement new features depends on several factors:

The number of customers requesting the feature. Obviously more requests elevates the priority.
The complexity of the feature, particularly if it requires a user interface change. We strive to keep AppColl easy-to-use - keeping the UI simple and uncluttered is a big part of that.
The generality of the request. Is this something all AppColl users would find useful or just a few?
We've recorded your suggestion and we will let you know if and when we have a schedule for implementation.

We very much appreciate you taking the time to send us thoughts about how to improve AppColl. Keep the ideas coming!

Yup, I agree, this is a little task that I do, but I would love it if it were already completed when I received the doc!