Posts made by gregg_appcoll

@JudithS7838

Yes this will be done by year-end.

@ChristianS9906 Got it. I will add this as a new feature request.

Hi Christian,

We can probably do this with the assumption that priority claims are made based on 35 USC 119. Just so I am crystal clear, we would put the EBD as the earliest filed application whether it's provisional or not? Or ignore the provisional's filing date?

Gregg

Thanks for the suggestion. We will certainly pass this on to engineering.

The reason may have been to stop generating a number of tasks when the priority date changes. This allows you to manually edit what you need.

@JanisA1115

This is a good idea and something we have added as a new feature request with our engineering group. We will let you know when this has been implemented. An ETA is not know as of yet. Thanks.

@ChristianS9906 - Sorry for the delay. We bumped the priority of this so it should get done much quicker. I don't have an exact ETA on this. I hope this helps.

HI George - only the payments and retainer sections should show 10-03-24. The reason why is that we will allow payments to be pulled into the invoice up to the date it's resaved. The idea being, if a customer made a partial payment on Oct-01, we want to include that if the invoice was regenerated on the 3rd.

With that being said, we will add some text that says Payment and Retainers through October 3, 2024. We hope this helps.

@AccountingA3700

We have added this as a formal new feature request. We will let you know when this has been added.

Hi Leslie,

We're working with engineering to see if this is possible. We will get back to you soon. Thanks.

• AppColl Support

@amy_appcoll

Yes, there is. You can use triggers for multiple task types that are all the same. So task 1 would trigger when some other action occurs. Task 2 would trigger from the exact same action as task 1 did. Same with tasks 3, 4, etc.

@NicoleA5248

We evaluated this and came to the conclusion that the data in Patent Center was incomplete and some times invalid. As such, we still rely on eSpaceNet which has cleaner data at this time.

We will look at this again down the road to se if things have gotten better.

@KimG5166

Thank you for the suggestion. We will look into adding an option to choose between the two. We hope this helps.

@BrandonK6644 Let me get back to you on this.

@BrandonK6644 The following query should work for your first question. Please let us know if you have questions.

We will certainly get this added Christian. Thanks for letting us know.

We might be able to do this if you're using AppColl to send the email. We will pass this onto engineering. Unfortunately, it would not be possible to do so if you're using Outlook/Gmail due to browser restrictions on the amount of data that can be sent to another email program.

Hi Kim,

Thank you for the suggestion. We will pass your suggestion on to engineering for future consideration. Please keep the ideas coming.

Hi Nicole,

The following should help.

https://support.appcoll.com/prior-art/cross-cite-prior-art-references

Specifically the section titled" Copy selected references from one matter to another"

Please let us know if this works.

@BrandonK6644 Thank you for the suggestion. We will pass this on to our engineering group for future consideration.

@BrandonK6644 The first report maybe possible, we're looking into this and will get back to you.

The second report is possible provided you have created a custom "File RCE" task type and close them as they are filed. Do you currently have this set up? Thanks.

@BrandonK6644 Thank you for the suggestion. We will certainly pass this on to engineering for future consideration. Keep the ideas coming.

@GeorgeJ4336

You should be able to sync tasks without issue. When you look into the Sync settings, there will be an option to enable these, along with the ability to choose which fields you wish to copy over.

Also, you should be able to sync email notes as of Friday. Please let us know if you need further assistance.

Hi Amy - Each time a document is saved (with the same name) a revision is created. Since we do not provide for editing a document within AppColl, the document must be edited on your local PC/Mac and then uploaded back into AppColl. This will create a new revision. Under this scenario, users would never be editing the same document.

We hope this helps.

Hi George,

Thanks for the feedback. Adding the ability to calculate foreign exchange rates is a great idea. We will pass this on to engineering for their consideration.

@ChristianS9906

Thanks for the feedback. We are working on some updates and we'll take your suggestions under consideration. Keep the ideas coming.

@RichardT8744

Hi Richard - setting up periodic reports is the way to go for exporting data. This can be sent to your SFTP server, S3 buckets or traditional email.

You can also send data to our SFTP server, which we can upload into your account. You would need to reach out if this route is something you're considering.

We hope this helps.

@GeorgeJ4336

This is great information. Adding multiple signatures per document is our highest priority for Signatures. We will let you know when this has been added.

@GeorgeJ4336 Hi George. Thank you for the feedback. How do you currently handle? Do you have inventor 1 sign and PDF back to you. Then have inventor 2 sign the same document inventor 1 signed and then PDF back the same document. And then on to the next, etc.?

@ChristianS9906 Thank you for the suggestion. We have passed this onto engineering for future consideration and will let you know if we have a plan for this. Thank you and keep the suggestions coming.